Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05144
Original file (BC 2013 05144 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05144

	XXXXX  	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 18 Jul 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition during the contested FA, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

He was diagnosed with a stroke-inter Cranial Hemorrhage tied to a Cavernous Malformation in his brain.

He in not allowed to raise his blood pressure over 135. 

The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.  His commander submitted the request to remove the FA from his record, but it had already been entered into the AFFMS.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 Jul 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory composite score.

IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13; states any military member can appeal their Fitness Assessment through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error/injustice.

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the unit commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 18 Jul 13. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1. The application was timely filed.

2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In view of this, we find this application is not ripe for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05144 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXX, Chair
	XXXXX, Vice Chair
	XXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXX
                                   Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05442

    Original file (BC 2013 05442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00298

    Original file (BC 2014 00298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00298 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625

    Original file (BC 2013 01625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered “Unsatisfactory.” The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087

    Original file (BC 2013 01087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00081

    Original file (BC 2013 00081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04884

    Original file (BC 2013 04884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 but no later than 7 calendar days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete an FSQ does not invalidate the FA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 12 Sep 13. In particular, the applicant has provided medical documentation validating that he had a medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05191

    Original file (BC 2013 05191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951

    Original file (BC 2013 02951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she “Meets” the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05080

    Original file (BC 2013 05080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05080 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In view of this and since...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05060

    Original file (BC 2013 05060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation dated 18 Oct 13. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.